Great input Milan! That makes sense because I’ve noticed there are already some Sellers in that neighborhood that own two or three adjacent parcels giving them more space and privacy or for investment.

FYI, I got them for a steal and was even thinking of also doing a MLS “Flat-Fee listing” on the Retail side for a couple hundred bucks for NM…[Read more]

Thanks for the encouragement! – LS

Hey Luke,

I saw you on REtipster a while ago, sounds like you’ve got this figured out. Question on your websites (they both look great btw). Does your buying websites generate any additional land purchases you wouldn’t otherwise have found?

Chuck, I am dealing with similar situation. And I’m marketing them separately. If interested buyer shows up I’ll give him an option to buy a second one discounted.

You’ll have bigger pool of buyers for cheaper smaller property. Off course unless
wholesaler shows up.

If you market them together is opposite of splitting the parcels. I think…[Read more]

Great input Rod, thank you! I will test all the above and maybe even find a mini-niche out of the results for the future. 🙂

Joe – Glad you figured that out. And thanks for sharing.

Richard – Nice of RQ to help you out. I don’t think I select for SFR. But you can’t blame RQ for the data. Some counties are very bad at managing their own data. Garbage in = garbage out. My second mailer was for 0 improvements. However the county that I was mailing in didn’t really keep track of that. I had some guy cussing me our because I…[Read more]

Kevin,

Thank you again for sharing your experience and helping another new investor, I really do appreciate it! I did call them and they sent me the data again. I had not selected property characteristics when ordering data the first time.

Now that I have a chance to look over the spreadsheet closely, 80 percent of the parcels have houses on…[Read more]